Advanced search
Visit
2229
Last Updated: 2008/03/04
Summary of question
What is philosophy? Why is it bad?
question
There is a hadith from Imam Hasan Askari (A.S.) which says that the scholars in the apocalyptic period turn to philosophy and Roman Sufism. I wish to know what philosophy is and why is it bad?
Concise answer

As for your question about the alleged hadith, we should say that we looked for it in our hadith collections but we did not find it.

As for the definition of philosophy, it has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being.  Its subject deals with the essential properties of being qua being.  Its end is to achieve a general knowledge of existents and to distinguish them from that which is not really existent. When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy for some reasons. For instance, Al-Ghazzali has raised certain criticisms in his Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) but Ibn Rushd (Averroes) has rejected all those criticisms in Tahāfut al- Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence). Those who are opposed to philosophy maintain that the fundamentals and problems of philosophy stand in contrast with the religion whereas it is not the case. Great philosophers like Mulla Sadra have stated that philosophy does not contradict with religious teachings and principles. Therefore, not only we should not oppose philosophy but we should also endeavor to learn it well.

Detailed Answer

As for the first part of the question, we went through many hadith collections to find the hadith but we could not find it anywhere. It would have been better if you gave the reference for the said tradition so that we could conduct a research into it and give you a more precise answer.

When it comes to the second part of your question i.e. the definition of philosophy, we must say that philosophy has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being. In fact, philosophy is the knowledge of the realities of things, as they are in fact, so that through knowing these realities and the objective order of the world, man may realize in himself a microcosmic rational order, which corresponds to the objective world.[1]

When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy. Different people have opposed philosophy with different motives. However, those of the learned, informed and unbiased scholars who have opposed philosophy, they have in reality opposed the common set of philosophical ideas some of which were not compatible with Islamic principles. Perhaps, if there is a valid narration censuring or reproofing philosophy, it is because of those incompatible ideas. When we speak of philosophy, we do not insist on all the philosophers’ views and statements being right. In fact, what we mean by philosophical attempt is the application of reason in understanding issues that can be resolved only through intellection. This endeavor has been recommended by Quranic verses as well as traditions; just like the arguments which have been produced in the Book and tradition concerning monotheism and resurrection.[2]

Now it is necessary to go through the arguments presented by the opponents of philosophy:

One of the reasons for opposing philosophy is that if philosophy could solve any problems and had any benefit, then why do philosophers disagree on a subject? In other words, the best reason for them to reproof philosophy is the discrepancy existing among the philosophers themselves causing the scholars to lose their confidence in the validity of their methods. In response to these objections, the proponents of philosophy say that discrepancies exist in every science such as those existing in mathematics. For example, if two individuals have different opinions on a mathematical issue, we cannot judge that mathematics is useless and void. As a matter of fact, these differences can motivate the expert in that branch of knowledge to further their efforts until they can reach more reliable results.[3]

Another reason for opposing philosophy is what the philosophers say is opposed to the religion. For example, al-Ghazzali is one of the opponents of philosophy. He has opposed philosophy in his book Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) and has said that what philosophers are saying end up in many cases in kufr (infidelity). For example, the philosophical ideas relating to God’s knowledge, the eternity of the world and physical resurrection are opposed to religious beliefs.[4] But Averroes (Ibn Rushd) wrote Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) in response to al-Ghazzali’s objections. He has rejected al-Ghazzali’s arguments at length. He says, “If there are some differences between the religion and philosophy, they are related to the philosophical allegations of those who claim to be theosophists and philosophers whereas they have understood nothing from philosophy. If there is anyone who is well acquainted with philosophy and method of intellection, he knows very well that philosophical ideas are in no way in contrast with religion.[5]

Another reason to prove that real philosophers do not oppose the religion and religious principles is the saying of the greatest Islamic philosopher, Sadrul Muta’llehin (Mulla Sadra) who says in his book, the Four Journeys (al-Asfar al-Arba’ah):

تباً لفلسفة تكون قوانینها غیر مطابقة للكتاب و السنة

“Curse and death to any philosophy whose rules and principles are incompatible with the Book and tradition (Sunnah).” [6]

Not only have the proponents of philosophy answered the spurious arguments by the proponents but they have also explained the need for philosophy. For instance, they have said that basically true humanity depends on philosophical achievements in the sense that man’s privilege or distinction rests in his vision and tendency. Hence, if an individual suffices only to physical conceptions and does not use properly the faculty of reason, he cannot be a real human being. Philosophy consolidates the power of intellect or the faculty of reason in man.

Accordingly, a true human being is one who uses his intelligence in understanding the most important and most crucial issues to learn generally how to live a life. Basically, identifying and understanding issues that are crucial to man depend on philosophical attempts.[7]

Having said that and in view of the evidence we provided, we can conclude that philosophy is not bad and there is no reason to oppose it.

 

 


[1] - See: Mesbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi, Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, Bainulmelal (International) Publications, 7th edition 1387 (2009).

[2] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 137.

[3] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 135.

[4] - Ghazzali, Muhammad, Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of Philosophers), pg. 44, Beirut.

[5] - Ibn Rushd, Faslul Maqal, p.g 26 cited from Naqd-o- Nazar (Specialized philosophy journal), 11th year, No. 1 & 2, year 1385 (2006),pg. 181.

[6] - Mulla Sadra, Al-Arba’ah, vol.8, pg. 303, Dar al-Ma’aref al-Islamiyah, 1378 A.H. Tehran.

[7] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1 pg. 135.

 

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Categorization by subject

Random questions

  • What is the meaning of abjad letters, especially in relation to Imam Ali?
    5259 Theoretical 2012/05/21
    The abjad letters are the alphabet (الف ب ت...), which have been systemized based on a specific order, meaning: abjad, hūz, ḥatī, kalamn, sa'afṣ, qarasht, thakhdh, ḍaẓgh. A number has been assigned for every one of these letters, in following order: الف 1 ب 2 ج 3 د ...
  • What must be said during the temporary marriage and what are its terms and conditions?
    2865 Laws and Jurisprudence 2007/01/04
    In order to carry out a temporary (concubine) marriage contract, a number of prerequisites ought to be executed: (i)                   the contract's formula ought to be read out. Consent (from the man and woman involved), alone, does not suffice; such a consent, moreover, must be accompanied by a declaration of specific and ...
  • What is the ruling regarding joyful and rousing music mixed with a song by a female singer?
    2111 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/11/10
    If foreign music is of ghina and haram type, it is not permissible to listen to it. Haram music is the music which is commensurate with the gatherings of entertainment and moral depravity. According to jurisprudents, it is absolutely not permissible to listen to such type of music irrespective of ...
  • If there are levels for heaven, are there levels for hell?
    1930 Traditional 2012/03/10
    What is understood from Quranic verses and the ahadith is that, similar to heaven,[1] hell has different levels, and sinners will be put into these levels depending on the number and type of their sins. In a hadith from Imam Baqir about the verse: “لَها سَبْعَةُ أَبْوابٍ لِكُلِّ بابٍ مِنْهُمْ جُزْءٌ ...
  • Philosophers say that evil cannot come from God, while verse 8 of surah Shams proves the exact opposite; is this paradox resolvable?
    1660 Islamic Philosophy 2012/04/21
    The only thing verse 8 of surah Shams mentions is that God’s “do’s and don’ts” have been transmitted to the people and they, using their minds and conscience they have been endowed with by Allah, can easily distinguish between vice and virtue. Therefore, this verse isn't saying that evil comes ...
  • Why does the Quran say that you can beat your wives?
    1558 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/11/09
    Perhaps one may think about the third tactic or remedy at the first glance (after admonition and banishing wives to bed apart) that Islam wants men to be free to exercise power and force on women in any manner they want and that they are allowed to make women surrender ...
  • Is the network marketing of Tahitian Noni juice permissible?
    1752 Laws and Jurisprudence 2009/03/09
    If your question is about the ruling on marketing this drink as a result of it being halal or haram itself, this is the answer the maraje’ have given to your inquiry:The office of the Grand Ayatullah Khamenei:It is permissible per se.The office of the Grand Ayatullah Sistani:As long as ...
  • What is the husband's duty when there is a disagreement between his mother and wife?
    1464 Practical 2010/09/05
    Even though parents have a great status in Islam, but every member of the family, whether it is the mother, father or wife, has his/her own rights which should all be respected.If there is a contention between the parents and the wife, the husband should try his best not to ...
  • Is it true that some Muslim Gnostics can fly or levitate?
    2237 Practical 2007/02/08
    That which you have mentioned is an effect and result of Man’s spiritual strength, sometimes this may come about by acting in accordance with religious laws and legitimate ascetic discipline. This means that; by moving closer to Allah, Man can possess the greatest name of God, and gain existential authority, ...
  • What kind of wilayah (authority) did the Holy Prophet (s) mean in Ghadir Khum?
    1484 Traditional 2012/03/14
    Considering that the Prophet (s) appointed the Commander of the Faithful, Ali (a.s) in an absolute and general way, the Holy Prophet's authority in its entirety, irrespective of whether it is mystical, religious or political, is also proven for Ali (a.s.). ...

Popular

Links