Advanced search
Visit
2083
Last Updated: 2008/03/04
Summary of question
What is philosophy? Why is it bad?
question
There is a hadith from Imam Hasan Askari (A.S.) which says that the scholars in the apocalyptic period turn to philosophy and Roman Sufism. I wish to know what philosophy is and why is it bad?
Concise answer

As for your question about the alleged hadith, we should say that we looked for it in our hadith collections but we did not find it.

As for the definition of philosophy, it has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being.  Its subject deals with the essential properties of being qua being.  Its end is to achieve a general knowledge of existents and to distinguish them from that which is not really existent. When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy for some reasons. For instance, Al-Ghazzali has raised certain criticisms in his Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) but Ibn Rushd (Averroes) has rejected all those criticisms in Tahāfut al- Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence). Those who are opposed to philosophy maintain that the fundamentals and problems of philosophy stand in contrast with the religion whereas it is not the case. Great philosophers like Mulla Sadra have stated that philosophy does not contradict with religious teachings and principles. Therefore, not only we should not oppose philosophy but we should also endeavor to learn it well.

Detailed Answer

As for the first part of the question, we went through many hadith collections to find the hadith but we could not find it anywhere. It would have been better if you gave the reference for the said tradition so that we could conduct a research into it and give you a more precise answer.

When it comes to the second part of your question i.e. the definition of philosophy, we must say that philosophy has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being. In fact, philosophy is the knowledge of the realities of things, as they are in fact, so that through knowing these realities and the objective order of the world, man may realize in himself a microcosmic rational order, which corresponds to the objective world.[1]

When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy. Different people have opposed philosophy with different motives. However, those of the learned, informed and unbiased scholars who have opposed philosophy, they have in reality opposed the common set of philosophical ideas some of which were not compatible with Islamic principles. Perhaps, if there is a valid narration censuring or reproofing philosophy, it is because of those incompatible ideas. When we speak of philosophy, we do not insist on all the philosophers’ views and statements being right. In fact, what we mean by philosophical attempt is the application of reason in understanding issues that can be resolved only through intellection. This endeavor has been recommended by Quranic verses as well as traditions; just like the arguments which have been produced in the Book and tradition concerning monotheism and resurrection.[2]

Now it is necessary to go through the arguments presented by the opponents of philosophy:

One of the reasons for opposing philosophy is that if philosophy could solve any problems and had any benefit, then why do philosophers disagree on a subject? In other words, the best reason for them to reproof philosophy is the discrepancy existing among the philosophers themselves causing the scholars to lose their confidence in the validity of their methods. In response to these objections, the proponents of philosophy say that discrepancies exist in every science such as those existing in mathematics. For example, if two individuals have different opinions on a mathematical issue, we cannot judge that mathematics is useless and void. As a matter of fact, these differences can motivate the expert in that branch of knowledge to further their efforts until they can reach more reliable results.[3]

Another reason for opposing philosophy is what the philosophers say is opposed to the religion. For example, al-Ghazzali is one of the opponents of philosophy. He has opposed philosophy in his book Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) and has said that what philosophers are saying end up in many cases in kufr (infidelity). For example, the philosophical ideas relating to God’s knowledge, the eternity of the world and physical resurrection are opposed to religious beliefs.[4] But Averroes (Ibn Rushd) wrote Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) in response to al-Ghazzali’s objections. He has rejected al-Ghazzali’s arguments at length. He says, “If there are some differences between the religion and philosophy, they are related to the philosophical allegations of those who claim to be theosophists and philosophers whereas they have understood nothing from philosophy. If there is anyone who is well acquainted with philosophy and method of intellection, he knows very well that philosophical ideas are in no way in contrast with religion.[5]

Another reason to prove that real philosophers do not oppose the religion and religious principles is the saying of the greatest Islamic philosopher, Sadrul Muta’llehin (Mulla Sadra) who says in his book, the Four Journeys (al-Asfar al-Arba’ah):

تباً لفلسفة تكون قوانینها غیر مطابقة للكتاب و السنة

“Curse and death to any philosophy whose rules and principles are incompatible with the Book and tradition (Sunnah).” [6]

Not only have the proponents of philosophy answered the spurious arguments by the proponents but they have also explained the need for philosophy. For instance, they have said that basically true humanity depends on philosophical achievements in the sense that man’s privilege or distinction rests in his vision and tendency. Hence, if an individual suffices only to physical conceptions and does not use properly the faculty of reason, he cannot be a real human being. Philosophy consolidates the power of intellect or the faculty of reason in man.

Accordingly, a true human being is one who uses his intelligence in understanding the most important and most crucial issues to learn generally how to live a life. Basically, identifying and understanding issues that are crucial to man depend on philosophical attempts.[7]

Having said that and in view of the evidence we provided, we can conclude that philosophy is not bad and there is no reason to oppose it.

 

 


[1] - See: Mesbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi, Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, Bainulmelal (International) Publications, 7th edition 1387 (2009).

[2] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 137.

[3] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 135.

[4] - Ghazzali, Muhammad, Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of Philosophers), pg. 44, Beirut.

[5] - Ibn Rushd, Faslul Maqal, p.g 26 cited from Naqd-o- Nazar (Specialized philosophy journal), 11th year, No. 1 & 2, year 1385 (2006),pg. 181.

[6] - Mulla Sadra, Al-Arba’ah, vol.8, pg. 303, Dar al-Ma’aref al-Islamiyah, 1378 A.H. Tehran.

[7] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1 pg. 135.

 

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Categorization by subject

Random questions

  • Were Imām Sajjād and Imām Bāqir present in Karbalā?
    1438 تاريخ بزرگان 2012/04/16
    In the event of 'Āshūrā which took place during the month of Muḥarram in 61 AH, three noble Imāms were present. Imām Ḥusayn (as) who headed this revolution and was martyred in Karbalā. Imām Sajjād (as), [who] for reasons could not participate in the battle, and in accordance to ...
  • What are the legal obligations of a wife towards her husband?
    1798 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/12/21
    The sustainability, continuity and stability of a marital life depend on love, understanding and respect for mutual rights.  In order for the family, which is small social unit, to be solidified and strengthened, the religion of Islam has made an arrangement in a way such that it has determined specific ...
  • Can I use the money which I have in Turkish banks to purchase savings bonds and receive interest?
    967 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/10/29
    Office of Grand Ayatollah Khamenei (may Allah grant him long life): There is no problem in conducting transactions which are permissible according to Shari'ah rules. However, interest-based transactions and taking interest from Islamic banks and financial institutes is not permissible except for when the assets of the bank belong to ...
  • If there are levels for heaven, are there levels for hell?
    1803 Traditional 2012/03/10
    What is understood from Quranic verses and the ahadith is that, similar to heaven,[1] hell has different levels, and sinners will be put into these levels depending on the number and type of their sins. In a hadith from Imam Baqir about the verse: “لَها سَبْعَةُ أَبْوابٍ لِكُلِّ بابٍ مِنْهُمْ جُزْءٌ ...
  • What is absolute existence? What is indeterminate existence?
    1690 Islamic Philosophy 2011/12/20
    Absolute existence has different meanings and usages; sometimes it means ‘unconditional’; that there is no condition limiting it, not even the condition of absoluteness (one of its conditions isn't absoluteness). Sometimes, this isn't the case, and although it is absolute, it is still limited to the condition of absoluteness (one ...
  • Which supplications are ones that are quickly answered and give one what he/she is asking for without much delay?
    3395 Practical 2009/12/16
    Many supplications or duas have been narrated by the infallible imams (as) that have been answered and are considered of those that are quickly answered; here we will only list them without mentioning their texts:1- The dua of Tawassul2- The dua of Faraj3- The dua of Ism A’dham4- The dua ...
  • Is it permissible to steal from internet websites?
    1136 Laws and Jurisprudence 2012/02/15
    Since you want the Islamic law about the question in your email, we deemed it necessary to forward the same question to the offices of some of the living prominent jurists. The answers which we have received from them are as under:Office of Grand Ayatollah Sistani (may Allah grant him ...
  • Who was Prophet Daniel?
    2692 تاريخ بزرگان 2009/11/24
    This question doesn’t have a brief answer. Please click on the detailed answer. ...
  • Is there any reason for the permissibility of chest beating and self-hitting of some Muslims that is done in Muharram and other times?
    1980 History of Fiqh 2011/04/20
    Mourning for Imam Husein (as) is one of the highest forms of worship, and doing anything for him that is considered a form of mourning in culture and society is permissible, unless it really brings about a considerable amount of harm to the body, or is a means of the ...
  • Describe the proof of the existence of God and the manner of how he came into being.
    1871 Philosophy 2010/08/14
    God Almighty, is a being which is absolute existence and complete perfection devoid of all deficiencies and imperfections. The concept of God is one which is very simple and clear. Everyone, including those who deny his existence, are able to comprehend and understand it. Even though the understanding of the ...

Popular

Links