Advanced search
Visit
7059
Last Updated: 2011/12/20
Summary of question
Doesn’t there seem to be a discrepancy between the first verse of surah Anfāl, which allocates the ownership of all war spoils to Allah (swt) and the prophet, and verse 41 of the same surah which only entitles them to one fifth of the spoils?
question
The first verse of surah Anfāl allocates all war spoils to Allah (swt) and the prophet without any exception, while verse 41 of the same surah only allocates one fifth of that wealth to them, and obviously, the rest of the fourth fifths will belong to the fighters. Which of these two contradicting verses in your opinion is the one to follow?
Concise answer

First of all, from a logical perspective, ‘anfāl’ and ‘war spoils’ aren't equal, and aside from this point, it must be said that from a one point of view, everything in the entire universe belongs to Allah (swt), but from another point view, some material endowments, without Allah’s ownership being disturbed, are also in the supposed ownership of people, and there is no contradiction between the two.

Detailed Answer

The verses that seem to be contradictory at first sight are:

a) “یَسْئَلُونَکَ عَنِ الْأَنْفالِ قُلِ الْأَنْفالُ لِلَّهِ وَ الرَّسُول‏...[1] (They ask you concerning the anfāl. Say," The anfālbelong to Allah and the Apostle…)

b) “وَ اعْلَمُوا أَنَّما غَنِمْتُمْ مِنْ شَیْ‏ءٍ فَأَنَّ لِلَّهِ خُمُسَهُ وَ لِلرَّسُولِ و...[2] (Know that whatever thing you may come by, a fifth of it is for Allah and the Apostle…).

In this regard, one must say that in addition to there being no logical identicalness between ‘anfāl’ and ‘war spoils’ (thus, resolving the seeming contradiction from the start), but there is also a point here that can clarify things further.

At first sight and from one point of view, everything in this universe, including our existence and everything in it that we can benefit from, belong to Allah (swt), and this is a reality that many verses of the Quran touch on:

1- “لِلَّهِ ما فِی السَّماواتِ وَ ما فِی الْأَرْض[3] (To Allah belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth).

2- “إِنَّا لِلَّهِ وَ إِنَّا إِلَیْهِ راجِعُون[4] (To Allah we belong, and unto Allah is our return).

3- “قُلْ لِمَنْ ما فِی السَّماواتِ وَ الْأَرْضِ قُلْ لِلَّه[5] (Say," To whom belongs whatever is in the heavens and the earth?" Say," To Allah).

On the other hand and from another point of view though, Allah has granted the people ownership of some of the things in this world, and has announced this in general and through certain categorizations.

In one place, He introduces Himself as such: “هُوَ الَّذی جَعَلَ لَکُمُ الْأَرْضَ ذَلُولاً فَامْشُوا فی‏ مَناکِبِها وَ کُلُوا مِنْ رِزْقِهِ وَ إِلَیْهِ النُّشُور[6] (It is He who made the earth tractable for you; so walk on its flanks and eat of His provision, and towards Him is the resurrection).

In cases such as khums[7], inheritance[8], ownership[9], etc., also, it seems that the lord considers the people owners of a portion of the material world. It is clear that there is no difference and contradiction between these two points of view. The Quran has beautifully pointed to both of these viewpoints in one verse: “وَ سَخَّرَ لَکُمْ ما فِی السَّماواتِ وَ ما فِی الْأَرْضِ جَمیعاً مِنْهُ إِنَّ فی‏ ذلِکَ لَآیاتٍ لِقَوْمٍ یَتَفَکَّرُون[10] (And He has disposed for you[r benefit] whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth; all is from Him. There are indeed signs in that for a people who reflect).

Keeping the abovementioned points in mind, and even assuming that the terms ‘war spoils’ and ‘anfāl’ are equivalents of each other, it can be said that granting ownership to the fighters regarding the four fifths of the war spoils stems from the absolute ownership of the lord, and their ‘supposed’ ownership will in no way disturb His true ownership.



[1] Anfāl:1.

[2] Anfāl:41.

[3] Baqarah:284; Aal Imraan:109 and 129; Nisaa’:126; etc.

[4] Baqarah:156.

[5] An’aam:12.

[6] Mulk:15.

[7] Anfāl:41.

[8] Nisaa’:11-12.

[9] Yasin:71.

[10] Jathiyah:13.

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Number of comments 0
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Thematic Category

Random questions

  • Does belching out what one has eaten invalidate the fast?
    7407 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/08/01
    If one who is fasting belches out something and it comes into the mouth, if he swallows it again, it will invalidate his fast no matter how little it is and he has to make up for it and also make kaffarah (either fast 60 ...
  • Please provide us with a short biography of Imam Ali al-Sajjad (as).
    3610 امام سجاد ع 2021/03/30
  • What are the signs for the reemergence of the Master of the Age [i.e. the Twelfth Imam]?
    10356 Modern 2011/08/10
    The topic of the signs of the re-emergence is a complicated one and calls for a thorough investigation of all the related narrations. However, in brief, the signs fall under two categories. One group consists of those signs which will certainly occur, foreshadowing the re-emergence: the rebellion ...
  • What is teyyul-ard?
    7577 Theoretical 2010/07/20
    There are different views on the true essence of teyyul-ard. One would be the theory of “اعدام و ایجاد” or “Existentiation and Elimination” of the renowned mystic, Ibn Arabi. According to this theory, the person eliminates his existence in one place and existentiates it in ...
  • What are the punishments for shaking hands with a non-Mahram, physical contact and not observing Islamic modest dress?
    20428 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/11/21
    Different punishments and penalties have been reported, in our religious sources, for the sins mentioned in the question. We will suffice to quoting a few traditions in this regard:A) Shaking hands with a non-mahram:1. The ...
  • Why was Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H.) allowed to have more than four wives?
    19591 The infallibles 2007/04/05
    The topic of the prophet of Islam’s (P.B.U.H.) marriages and number of spouses is a subject which has been questioned very much. In reference to this issue, we should mention first of all that before the ruling for the impermissibility of ...
  • Was the wife of Hazrat Abbas, Lady Lubaba, present in Karbala?
    17518 اهل بیت و یاران 2017/08/22
    1. Lubaba was the daughter of Ubaidullah bin Abbas[1] (the Prophet”s cousin) and the wife of Hazrat Abulfazl Abbas (AS). Following the event of Karbala and the martyrdom of Hazrat Abbas, she married Zaid bin Hasan[2].[3] It has ...
  • What are the legal obligations of a wife towards her husband?
    20376 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/12/21
    The sustainability, continuity and stability of a marital life depend on love, understanding and respect for mutual rights.  In order for the family, which is small social unit, to be solidified and strengthened, the religion of Islam has made an arrangement in a way such that it has ...
  • I needed some information on the Ithna’Ashari sect in West Africa.
    7570 Modern 2008/06/17
    We apologize for the delay in responding to you. Information like that which you are looking for can only be found in specific centers, and although our researchers tried their best, they weren’t able to get the desired results for your request. At the same time, we will introduce some ...
  • Why do Muslims shake hands?
    12704 Practical 2009/03/02
    Greeting others by saying “salam” and shaking hands are all signs of sociability and good manners and conduct. The prophet of Islam (pbuh) and the imams are at the pinnacle of sociability and good behavior and our role models, therefore we must follow them in this matter.Anas ibn ...

Popular